This section contains background information regarding boiler emissions. This section does not include emission performance for individual boiler models. Contact your local authorized representative for more information.
POLLUTANTS AND CONTROL TECHNIQUES
Combustion of standard fossil fuels (natural gas and ASTM Grade Oil) in commercial and industrial boilers results in the following nine emissions; carbon dioxide, nitrogen, oxygen, water, carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxide, sulfur oxides, volatile organic compounds, and particulate matter. The latter five products of combustion are considered pollutants and are known to, either directly or indirectly, cause harmful affects on humans and the environment.
The following section describes the formation and control of each of the pollutants in commercial and industrial boilers:
• Carbon Monoxide
• Nitrogen Oxides
• Sulfur Oxides
• Volatile Organic Compounds/Hydrocarbons
• Particulate Matter
NITROGEN COMPOUNDS (NOx)
Although there is evidence proving NOx, in itself, is harmful to humans, the main reason NOx is considered an environmental problem is because it initiates reactions that result in the production of ozone and acid rain. Ozone and acid rain can damage fabric, cause rubber to crack, reduce visibility, damage buildings, harm forests and lakes, and cause health problems. By controlling NOx levels, along with the other pollutants, the levels of acid rain and ozone can be reduced.
The principal nitrogen pollutants generated by boilers are nitric oxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2), collectively referred to as NOx. The contribution from different NOx sources to the total NOx levels varies among metropolitan areas. In general, the contribution of mobile sources to the total NOx level ranges from 60 to 80 percent: For stationary sources, it ranges between 20 and 40 percent. A significant portion of the NOx from stationary sources can be attributed to residential, commercial, and industrial sources, including industrial boilers. In industrial boilers, NOx is primarily formed in two ways; thermal NOx and fuel NOx: Thermal NOx is formed when nitrogen and oxygen in the combustion air combine with one another at the high temperatures in a flame. Thermal NOx makes up the majority of NOx formed during the combustion of gases and light oils.
Fuel NOx is formed by the reaction of nitrogen in the fuel with oxygen in the combustion air. It is rarely a problem with gaseous fuels. But in oils containing significant amounts of fuel-bound nitrogen, fuel NOx can account for up to 50% of the total NOx emissions. NOx emissions from boilers are influenced by many factors. The most significant factors are flame temperature and the amount of nitrogen in the fuel. Other factors affecting NOx formation are excess air level and combustion air temperature.
While flame temperature primarily affects thermal NOx formation, the amount of nitrogen in the fuel determines the level of fuel NOx emissions. Fuel containing more nitrogen results in higher levels of NOx emissions. Most NOx control technologies for industrial boilers, with inputs less than 100 MMBtu/hr, reduce thermal NOx and have little affect on fuel NOx. Fuel NOx is most economically reduced in commercial and industrial boilers by switching to cleaner fuels (fuels containing less fuel-bound nitrogen), if available.
NOx CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES
NOx controls can be classified into two types: post combustion methods and combustion control techniques. Post combustion methods address NOx emissions after formation while combustion control techniques prevent the formation of NOx during the combustion process. Post combustion methods tend to be more expensive than combustion control techniques and generally are not used on boilers with inputs of less than 100 MMBtu/hr. Following is a list of different NOx control methods.
Post combustion control methods include:
• Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction
• Selective Catalytic Reduction
• Combustion control techniques include:
• Low Excess Air Firing
• Low Nitrogen Fuel Oil
• Burner Modifications
• Water/Steam Injection
• Flue Gas Recirculation
Each method results in a different degree of NOx control. For example, when firing natural gas, low excess air firing typically reduces NOx by 10%, flue gas recirculation by 75%, and selective catalytic reduction by 90%.
POST COMBUSTION CONTROL METHODS
Selective Non-catalytic Reduction
Selective non-catalytic reduction involves the injection of a NOx reducing agent, such as ammonia or urea, into the boiler exhaust gases at a temperature of approximately 1400-1600°F. The ammonia or urea breaks down the NOx in the exhaust gases into water and atmospheric nitrogen. Selective non-catalytic reduction reduces NOx up to 70%.
However, the technology is extremely difficult to apply to industrial boilers that modulate or cycle frequently. This is because the ammonia (or urea) must be injected in the flue gases at a specific flue gas temperature. And, in industrial boilers that modulate or cycle frequently, the location of the exhaust gases at the specified temperature is constantly changing. Thus, it is not feasible to apply selective non-catalytic reduction to industrial boilers that have high turndown capabilities and modulate or cycle frequently.
Selective Catalytic Reduction
Selective catalytic reduction involves the injection of ammonia in the boiler exhaust gases in the presence of a catalyst. The catalyst allows the ammonia to reduce NOx levels at lower exhaust temperatures than selective non-catalytic reduction. Unlike selective non-catalytic reduction, where the exhaust gases must be approximately 1400-1600°F, selective catalytic reduction can be utilized where exhaust gasses are between 500°F and 1200°F, depending on the catalyst used. Selective catalytic reduction can result in NOx reductions up to 90%. However, it is costly to use and can rarely be cost justified on boilers with inputs less than 100 MMBtu/hr.
COMBUSTION CONTROL TECHNIQUES
Combustion control techniques reduce the amount of NOx emission by limiting the amount of NOx formation during the combustion process. This is typically accomplished by lowering flame temperatures. Combustion control techniques are more economical than post combustion methods and are frequently utilized on industrial boilers requiring NOx controls.
Low Excess Air (LEA) Firing
As a safety factor to assure complete combustion, boilers are fired with excess air. One of the factors influencing NOx formation in a boiler is the excess air levels. High excess air levels (>45%) may result in increased NOx formation because the excess nitrogen and oxygen in the combustion air entering the flame will combine to form thermal NOx. Low excess air firing involves limiting the amount of excess air that is entering the combustion process in order to limit the amount of extra nitrogen and oxygen that enters the flame. Limiting the amount of excess air entering a flame is accomplished through burner design and can be optimized through the use of oxygen trim controls. Low excess air firing can be used on most boilers and generally results in overall NOx reductions of 5-10% when firing natural gas.
Low Nitrogen Fuel Oil
When firing fuel oils, NOx formed by fuel-bound nitrogen can account for 20-50% of the total NOx level. One method to reduce NOx levels from boilers firing distillate oils is through the use of low nitrogen fuel oil. Low nitrogen oils can contain up to 15-20 times less fuel-bound nitrogen than standard No. 2 oil (less than 0.001% fuel-bound nitrogen). When low NOx oil is fired in firetube boilers utilizing flue gas recirculation, NOx reductions of 60%-70% over NOx emissions from standard No. 2 oils have been achieved. Low nitrogen oil is used most frequently in southern California.
Burner Modifications Burner modifications for NOx control involve changing the design of a standard burner in order to create a larger flame. Enlarging the flame results in lower flame temperatures and lower thermal NOx formation which, in turn, results in lower overall NOx emissions. The technology can be applied to most boiler types and sizes. It is most effective when firing natural gas and distillate fuel oil and has little affect on boilers firing heavy oil. To comply with the more stringent regulations, burner modifications must be used in conjunction with other NOx reduction methods, such as flue gas recirculation. If burner modifications are utilized exclusively to achieve low NOx levels (30 ppm), adverse affects on boiler operating parameters such as turndown, capacity, CO levels, and efficiency may result. It is important to address all aspects of boiler performance when selecting NOx control technologies.
Water or steam injection can be utilized to reduce NOx levels. By injecting water or steam into the flame, flame temperatures are reduced, thereby lowering thermal NOx formation and overall NOx levels. Water or steam injection can reduce NOx up to 80% (when firing natural gas) and can result in lower reductions when firing oils. There is a practical limit to the amount of water or steam that can be injected into the flame before condensation problems are experienced. Additionally, under normal operating conditions, water/steam injection can result in a 3-10% boiler efficiency loss. Many times water or steam injection is used in conjunction with other NOx control methods such as burner modifications or flue gas recirculation.
Flue Gas Recirculation
Flue gas recirculation, or FGR, is the most effective method of reducing NOx emission from industrial boilers with inputs below 100 MMBtu/hr. FGR entails recirculating a portion of relatively cool exhaust gases back into the combustion process in order to lower the flame temperature and reduce NOx formation. It is currently the most effective and popular low NOx technology for firetube and watertube boilers. And, in many applications, it does not require any additional reduction equipment to comply with regulations.
Flue gas recirculation technology can be classified into two types; external or induced.
External flue gas recirculation utilizes an external fan to recirculate the flue gases back into the flame. External piping routes the exhaust gases from the stack to the burner. A valve controls the recirculation rate, based on boiler input.
Induced flue gas recirculation utilizes the combustion air fan to recirculate the flue gases back into the flame. A portion of the flue gases are routed by duct work or internally to the combustion air fan, where they are premixed with the combustion air and introduced into the flame through the burner. New designs of induced FGR that utilize an integral FGR design are becoming popular among boiler owners and operators because of their uncomplicated design and reliability.
Theoretically, there is no limit to the amount of NOx reduction with FGR; practically, there is a physical, feasible limit. The limit of NOx reduction varies for different fuels Ñ 80% for natural gas and 20-25% for standard fuel oils.
The current trends with low NOx technologies are to design the boiler and low NOx equipment as a package. Designing as a true package allows the NOx control technology to be specifically tailored to match the boiler's furnace design features, such as shape, volume, and heat release. By designing the low NOx technology as a package with the boiler, the adverse effects of the low NOx technology on boiler operating parameters (turndown, capacity, efficiency, and CO levels) can be addressed and minimized.
CHOOSING THE BEST NOx TECHNOLOGY FOR THE JOB
What effect does NOx control technology ultimately have on a boiler's performance? Certain NOx controls can worsen boiler performance while other controls can appreciably improve performance. Aspects of the boiler performance that could be affected include turndown, capacity, efficiency, excess air, and CO emissions.
Failure to take into account all of the boiler operating parameters can lead to increased operating and maintenance costs, loss of efficiency, elevated CO levels, and shortening of the boiler's life.
The following section discusses each of the operating parameters of a boiler and how they are related to NOx control technologies.
Choosing a low NOx technology that sacrifices turndown can have many adverse effects on the boiler. When selecting NOx controls, the boiler should have a turndown capability of at least 4:1 or more, in order to reduce operating costs and the number of on/off cycles. A boiler utilizing a standard burner with a 4:1 turndown can cycle as frequently as 12 times per hour or 288 times a day because the boiler must begin to cycle at inputs below 25% capacity.
With each cycle, pre- and post-purge air flow removes heat from the boiler and sends it out the stack. The energy loss can be reduced by using a high turndown burner (10:1), which keeps the boiler on even at low firing rates.
Every time the boiler cycles off, before it comes back on, it must go through a specific start-up sequence for safety assurance. It takes between one to two minutes to get the boiler back on line. If there is a sudden load demand, the response cannot be accelerated. Keeping the boiler on line assures a quick response to load changes.
Frequent cycling also deteriorates the boiler components. The need for maintenance increases, the chance of component failure increases, and boiler downtime increases. So, when selecting NOx control, always consider the burners turndown capability.
When selecting the best NOx control, capacity and turndown should be considered together because some NOx control technologies require boiler derating in order to achieve guaranteed NOx reductions. For example, flame shaping (primarily enlarging the flame to produce a lower flame temperature - thus lower NOx levels) can require boiler derating, because the shaped flame could impinge on the furnace walls at higher firing rates.
However, the boiler's capacity requirement is typically determined by the maximum load in the steam/hot water system. Therefore, the boiler may be oversized for the typical load conditions that may occur. If the boiler is oversized, its ability to handle minimum loads without cycling is limited. Therefore, when selecting the most appropriate NOx control, capacity and turndown should be considered together for proper boiler selection and to meet overall system load requirements.
Some low NOx controls reduce emissions by lowering flame temperature, particularly in boilers with inputs less than 100 MMBtu/hr. Reducing the flame temperature decreases the radiant heat transfer from the flame and could lower boiler efficiency. The efficiency loss due to the lower flame temperatures can be partially offset by utilizing external components, such as an economizer. Or, the offset technique can be inherent in the NOx design.
One technology that offsets the efficiency loss due to lower flame temperatures in a firetube boiler is flue gas recirculation. Although the loss of radiant heat transfer could result in an efficiency loss, the recirculated flue gases increase the mass flow through the boiler - thus the convective heat transfer in the tube passes increases. The increase in convective heat transfer compensates for losses in radiant heat transfer, with no net efficiency loss. When considering NOx control technology, remember, it is not necessary to sacrifice efficiency for NOx reductions.
Carbon Monoxide (CO) Emissions
High flame temperatures and intimate air/fuel mixing are essential for low CO emissions. Some NOx control technologies used on industrial and commercial boilers reduce NOx levels by lowering flame temperatures by modifying air/fuel mixing patterns. The lower flame temperature and decreased mixing intensity can result in higher CO levels.
An induced flue gas recirculation package can lower NOx levels by reducing flame temperature without increasing CO levels. CO levels remain constant or are lowered because the flue gas is introduced into the flame in early stages of combustion and the air fuel mixing is intensified. Intensified mixing offsets the decrease in flame temperature and results in CO levels that are lower than achieved without FGR. But, the level of CO depends on the burner design. Not all flue gas recirculation applications result in lower CO levels.
Selecting the best low NOx control package should be made with total boiler performance in mind. Consider the application. Investigate all of the characteristics of the control technology and the effects of the technology on the boiler's performance. A NOx control technology that results in the greatest NOx reduction is not necessarily the best for the application or the best for high turndown, adequate capacity, high efficiency, sufficient excess air, or lower CO. The newer low NOx technologies provide NOx reductions without affecting total boiler performance.